heuristic: describe, in as few words as possible, how the new content would hypothetically affect the character and pay attention to the verb.

  • “The character is…” = Backgrounds (and Wound)
  • “The character owns…” = Items
  • “The character can…” = Skills

Working out the flowchart

Examples: Beautiful singing voice. Blademaster. Facial scar. Wise. Strong. Charming. Holy. Knowledgeable. Cybernetic implants. Friends in high places. Night vision. Extra limbs. Can talk to plants. Thinks he can talk to plants.   Plant whisperer. Plants talk to me. Magically adept. Knows Spanish. Knows the location of buried treasure. Has Dogs. Has Fleas. Has land and title. Has a gambling problem. Knows computer science. programmer. hacker. skilled hacker. famed hacker. Knows how to build a house. Surgeon. Good at <skill>. Good <job title>. Famed <job title>.
  • Looks like I need a column for “has” and some filtering rules
  • Looks like I need to do something with “knows”
  • Good at <attribute>/<job>/<skill> seems like a problem

these problems are all solved by forcing the peg into one of the “can/is/owns” holes and adding downsides

Heuristic: “The character …“

can == skillis (a/an/the) == backgroundowns (a/an/the) == item
play the fluteelfplate armor
talk to plantslanded nobleflaming sword
shoot fireballstallmany decks of cards
largehorse
handsomespaceship
hornednight vision goggles
fatlibrary
guard captainmany rare books
sneakycompass
boringcastle
scarred
liar
sociopath
liked by horses
centaur
gambling addict
known priest beater
kind
kings advisor
drug dealer
librarian
insane
insomniac
obligate carnivore
leper
amputee
crippled
incorporeal
haunted by past
haunted by ghosts
stubborn
bloodthirsty
polite
med school dropout
cult leader
famed space pirate
boxing world champion
infertile
shift manager at maccas
young and stupid
evil
charitable
yale student
vampire
muscular
attractive
fast
rich
Spanish
religious
prince’s ward

double check to make sure skills are fallible and backgrounds are not. skills are guaranteed to be fallible. backgrounds that are fallible can be handled with attributes.


some things can be a skill or background depending on certainty. “flying” for instance is probably a background (“levitates” or “winged”) unless it seems likely that other characters will frequently try to fly faster at which point it might be better as a skill. If it infrequent, an attribute could be used for those contests. really it doesn’t matter though because it should be handled either way.